songofcopper: (peter hammill)
A Glimpse of How My Mind Works

(Offered to all-comers, but especially [ profile] patrick_vecchio)

Earlier today, I was waiting for the bus when I caught sight of a sign board outside a betting shop. “Sprott to get yellow card in Nether Strumping Wanderers v. Oggen Fen United - odds of 33/1” it said. (Well, it didn’t say that exactly. I’m immune to the charm of sport in general and football in pertickler, so don’t rely on Me to remember either the name of the athlete in question or indeed the teams competing for glory.)

Anyway… it started me wondering how they work out the odds on something like that (or indeed any other wager - snow on Christmas, winner of Rear of the Year, exact date of world’s Trump-related spontaneous combustion, etc.).

It’s probably an algorithm, I told myself. Everything’s algorithms nowadays. This is without really knowing what an algorithm is or how it works - but it is a thing that apparently exists, and is observed to turn raw data into excuses for stuff (or perhaps I mean ‘reasons’… who knows). I must admit that I regard an algorithm with the same bemused, trusting expression with which 18th C. courtiers remarked the Mechanical Turk, whilst at the same time suspecting the existence of a secret compartment containing a conspiracy.

This should tell you that I am as about as well-informed as anyone else, i.e. Not Much.

Anyway… anyway… inward use of the word algorithm got me pondering its etymology. Which fished the word algolagnia from a small velvet-lined compartment in the left-hand side of my mind (somewhere towards the back). I began to wonder if the two words might be related.

Just then, the bus arrived. Equipped with the adult-pacifier, the together-alone machine, the just-in-case engine - a smartphone - I spent the first two minutes of my journey home enquiring of Google (because that is how ill-informed droolers like me find out stuff): “algorithm etymology”. Yes, these days we don’t even ask questions in whole sentences. This is the learning equivalent of ordering your dinner by pointing first at a photograph of chips and then at your open mouth.

Google told me that the word algorithm derives ultimately (via a twisty scenic route through Medieval Latin, French and mangled Greek) from Arabic: al-Khwarizmi, the name of a 9th C. Persian mathematician. Not just any 9th C. Persian mathematician - his works, when they arrived in translation in Europe, were immensely influential.

It gives one pause, to be reminded that much that we consider modern, much that our way of life relies on, can be traced back to the advances made by Islamic scholars like al-Khwarizmi. Without such discoveries, would there be Twitter?

Call me an ill-informed romantic nostalgia-junkie, but when I think of Islamic culture I tend to think of 9th C. mathematicians, Moorish architecture and generally feeling like an ignorant fellow next to those elegant minds whose fruits yielded the seeds that grew into the Renaissance. Politics and morals flare and die, but wisdom is aeternal.

Anyway… anyway… anyway… clearly, algorithms and algolagnia are not related after all.

I edited my verbless query: it now read “algolagnia etymology”.

All I could remember about the word from prior encounters was that it is has more euphony about it than ‘sadomasochism’, along with a piquant whiff of the alienist’s office. (Wouldn’t you rather confess your weirdness to an alienist than emote away to a counsellor?) Also that Algernon Swinburne had it, …often.

Google reminded me that it was coined in German, around the turn of the last century, “from Greek algos ‘pain’ + lagneia ‘lust’.”

Did you know that there are two contrary algolagniac trajectories available to the human? It has long been a belief of mine that formal, recreational sensation-seeking can be beneficial to one’s health and wellbeing. However, the unconscious, incidental, passive, tidal drift towards everyday pain is anything but good for you. Conscious intense ritual exploration can help do away with baseless guilt, allow you to confront fear and enable you to forge trust. (Is this the Archduke speaking through me right now? I rather think it is.) But blithely stumbling towards hurt and harm in everyday life is liable to cause great damage.

Is this what we (a broad, collective ‘we’) are currently allowing?


Popular media asks that we characterise ourselves and each other as Victims, Survivors, Heroes, Villains. If you’re not one, you must be another. Except, I and divers fellow delinquents are anomalous. We are in the precarious position of - oh dear me - Observers. This feels embarrassing (embarrasingly unnecessary) in Times Like These. If you’re not sitting on a sofa numbing yer inputs with Netflix, then you must be marching, surely. Because, because, if you’re not marching, you must be sitting on a sofa numbing yer inputs with Netflix.

I haven’t yet worked out whether it really is egregious to Observe. I spent most of last year feeling like a blot on the landscape, so much so that the present tumult has left me feeling strangely peaceful. I think it’s partly because what we have right now is Chaos. It is unpredictable. There is always, in life, the temptation to predict. To divine. That is especially catnippy to those of an anxious bent. But when you suddenly confront actual, live Chaos, you are forcibly made to realise that divination is not only impossible but farcical.

I’ll spell it out: I’m not shrugging and accepting it all, but the sheer bombastic appallingness is, in its own way, a relief. Our ‘what ifs’ have resolved into stark reality. Honest, blatant awfulness is much easier to name, describe and deal with than covert awfulness disguised as common sense. I’m also thankful for the opportunity to question my assumptions and reaffirm my principles. (I shall ever avoid morals but uphold principles.)

Ok, so now a new thought pops up: when the world stage is giving us a 24-hour rolling performance of real-live farce, what we need (amongst other things) is… fools. I mean, those individuals whose job it is to process the raw farce into surreal deadpan wit. I do not quite run to surreal deadpan wit, but I am most definitely a stubborn weirdo.

I know things look scary and unrecognisable right now, but I have this really strong feeling that 2017 is going to be a good year in which to be weird. In fact, weirdness is going to be crucial. We are going to need a lot of it.

What exists is permitted to exist. Included in that measure is a quantity of stubborn weirdos. Now that blatant awfulness is parading around smugly in broad daylight, that feels like an open invitation for weirdness to exist HARDER. I don’t know quite how that shall manifest for Yrs Trly, but it shall manifest nonetheless.
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at

Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.


songofcopper: (Default)

April 2017

2425 2627282930

Most Popular Tags

Eavesdrop, snoop, and sigh with yearning…

This journal is not a private diary, it is more like an occasional, imaginary column. Therefore, much of it is on public display. However, if you want to read my occasional attempts at creative writing, my Caution Elf tells me I should only show that stuff to my friends. You know what to do. :-)

NB: If you add me in an unsolicited fashion, please introduce yourself. Otherwise I will probably ignore you.

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Thursday, 21 September 2017 08:36
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios